Home

 

 

Every Word Counts

 

Business Communications

By: Patricia S. Eyres

         

 Evidence from business records generated over years and even decades affects an increasing number of civil lawsuits.

      In fact, damage awards have soared in recent years, some due to explosive content of business communications, gaps in documentation, inflammatory e-mail, or charges of evidence tampering.

      Most recently, General Motors was hit with a record $4.9 billion verdict, based largely on an internal memo a staff engineer wrote nearly two decades earlier. Similarly, in lawsuits against large insurers and small service providers, old marketing memos were pivotal evidence. Inflammatory e-mail messages haunted Microsoft in its antitrust trial, and offensive e-mail plagues employers in costly harassment lawsuits. These are just a few examples of business communica­tions created in one context and then spun against the company in the courtroom.

      Equally troublesome are high profile accusations of document shredding. Enron and Andersen are the latest (but not the only) businesses finding themselves on the defensive over when and how they destroyed evidence. From gigantic civil penalties to criminal obstruction of justice charges, haphazard enforcement of document retention and disposal policies is a legal minefield.

      Many managers today are unaware of the legal pitfalls inherent in generating written communications and business records. The fact is that during a trial, the courts may analyze everything from informal memos to performance appraisals to marketing plans, all of which may be turned against the company. Unfortunately, those managers who are ...

 

...Continued in the pages of Twin Plant News, Subscribe Today!

 
 

Home
     Advertising     Editorial     Back Issues     Suppliers & Services     Contact Us